Saturday 6 August 2016

B.F Skinner vs. N. chomsky: THEORIES ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT


                                              
                                                                Photo by: Web 

It is amazing to observe how our children learn language without us teaching them. Common teachers know that children’s mind are considered as an empty cabinet or the so called “tabularasa (concept).” With this, some parents usually believe (unconsciously, without any reference to scientific explanation) that it is because of their exposure to language, for example, they suggest to other parents to expose their children to different people and let them interact with them so they can acquire the language easily and continuously (This self-conceptualization of some parents proves that they do have unconscious knowledge that children start with nothing in their mind and they are liable to help them start learning certain language ).

As cited in the language development tripod page (retrieved, April 2, 2016) interactionist argue that language development is both biological and social. Interactionists argue that language learning is influence by the desire of children to communicate with others.

In relation to the above mentioned perceptions of language development. Skinner and Chomsky concretized how children learn language through their own observed theories:

          Skinner: Operant Conditioning

      B. F. Skinner believed that children learn language through operant          conditioning; in other words, children receive "rewards" for using language        in a functional manner. For example, a child learns to say the word "drink"          when she is thirsty; she receives something to drink, which reinforces her          use of the word for getting a drink, and thus she will continue to do so. This      follows the four-term contingency that Skinner believed was the basis of      language development—motivating operations, discriminative stimuli,         response, and reinforcing stimuli. Skinner also suggested that children learn language through imitation of others, prompting, and shaping.

          Chomsky: Language Acquisition Device


                  Noam Chomsky's work discusses the biological basis for language and claims that children have innate abilities to learn language. Chomsky terms this innate ability the "language acquisition device." He believes children instinctively learn language without any formal instruction. He also believes children have a natural need to use language, and that in the absence of formal language children will develop a system of communication to meet their needs. He has observed that all children make the same type of language errors, regardless of the language they are taught. Chomsky also believes in the existence of a "universal grammar," which posits that there are certain grammatical rules all human languages share. However, his research does not identify areas of the brain or a genetic basis that enables humans' innate ability for language.

Source: Boundless. “Human Language Development.” Boundless Psychology. Boundless, 13 Apr. 2016. Retrieved 22 Apr. 2016 from https://www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychology-textbook/language-10/human-language-408/human-language-development-235-12770/


No comments:

Post a Comment